Oscar Pistorius a 'broken man,' psychologist says at sentencing hearing
(CNN) -- Oscar Pistorius was a "broken man"after the
 death of his girlfriend, a psychologist said Monday, as the defense 
used a sentencing hearing to persuade the judge of his fragile emotional
 state.
Pistorius judge, stern yet compassionate
Remembering the 'Blade Runner's' career
Oscar Pistorius: Not guilty of murder
Dr. Lore Hartzenberg said
 the Olympian described his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, as the love of 
his life. He lost faith in himself and his abilities after the killing, 
she said.
But the prosecution dismissed her findings.
"We're dealing with a 
broken man - but he's still alive," Prosecutor Gerrie Nel said in 
apparent reference to the fact that Steenkamp is not. "He has lost his 
love relationship ... but he will be able to love somebody else like 
that."
New woman?
Nel questioned the 
psychologist about a woman the Olympian allegedly started seeing after 
the death of his girlfriend. Hartzenberg said she's not aware of his new
 relationship, and the two never discussed it during their sessions. 
The onetime South African sporting hero was found guilty of negligent killing last
 month in the death of his girlfriend. He returned to court Monday for a
 hearing that will determine whether he's going to prison.
Guilty of culpable homicide 
Judge Thokozile Masipa, who presided over his high-profile trial and delivered the verdict last month, will decide his sentence.
Pistorius was found guilty of culpable homicide, the South African term for unintentionally, but unlawfully, killing a person.
Pistorius judge, stern yet compassionate
Remembering the 'Blade Runner's' career
Oscar Pistorius: Not guilty of murder
However, Masipa cleared 
him of murder in the killing of model and law graduate Reeva Steenkamp. 
He was granted bail pending the sentencing hearing.
The hearing is likely to
 take several days, as both prosecution and defense will have the chance
 to put their arguments and evidence before the court.
There is no legal 
minimum or maximum sentence for culpable homicide in South African law, 
so it will be up to the judge to decide.
A typical sentence is 
five to eight years. But it is a principle of South African law that the
 sentence should be tailored to the culprit as a whole person, as 
opposed to the crime. That makes predicting a sentence difficult, said 
Kelly Phelps, a CNN legal analyst.
The judge also found Pistorius guilty of one weapons-related charge involving a shooting at a restaurant.
The maximum penalty for 
that is five years behind bars. But he could get a lesser sentence, such
 as a fine or the loss of his gun license.
It's likely that a 
pre-sentence report will be presented to the court, which may recommend a
 sentence -- although the judge is not bound by it. Also, both the 
prosecution and defense probably will tell the court what they consider 
an appropriate sentence to be.
Prison life?
If Pistorius is sent to 
prison, it's not clear whether his disability will allow him any special
 treatment. And daily life behind bars likely would not be easy.
Born with a congenital 
abnormality, he had both his legs amputated below the knee before his 
first birthday and uses prosthetic limbs to get around. The carbon-fiber
 blades he used to compete on the track -- before Steenkamp's killing 
abruptly halted his running career -- earned him the nickname 
"Bladerunner."
During his trial, his 
defense highlighted his vulnerability when on his stumps, while a 
court-ordered psychiatric assessment found that he was depressed, 
suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, and a suicide risk.
South Africa's prisons, 
meanwhile, are notorious for their overcrowding, which puts a strain on 
sanitation, ventilation and medical care for inmates.
Pistorius would likely 
receive far better treatment than the average prisoner, as he has 
throughout the judicial process, said Nooshin Erfani-Ghadimi, project 
coordinator for the Johannesburg-based Wits Justice Project, a civil 
society group.
Even so, she said, it will not make much difference.
"I don't think anyone 
with a disability necessarily will be able to be provided for at the 
moment in a way that ensures that they would have the correct medical 
treatment, that they have the correct physical structures," she said.
'Conduct was negligent'
Pistorius, 27, has 
always admitted firing the bullets that killed his girlfriend Steenkamp,
 29, a cover model about to turn reality-TV star. He pleaded not guilty 
to murdering her in his home on Valentine's Day last year, saying he 
believed there was a burglar and the killing was a tragic mistake.
But in grabbing his gun 
and heading toward the supposed threat, Pistorius "acted too hastily and
 used excessive force," Masipa ruled last month.
"His conduct was negligent" and not what a reasonable man would do in the circumstances -- not even a disabled one, she said.
Defense arguments about 
his upbringing in a crime-riddled environment might explain his conduct 
that night, but it does not excuse it, the judge said.
"The accused had reasonable time to reflect, to think and to conduct himself reasonably," she said.
Appeals process
Pistorius can appeal the
 verdict or the sentence, potentially to the Supreme Court of Appeal and
 even eventually to the South African Constitutional Court.
The state can appeal only if it believes the judge misinterpreted the law in reaching her verdict.
The right to appeal 
depends on whether, based on the facts of the case, the initial judge or
 magistrate believes a different court could possibly reach a different 
verdict.
The Constitutional Court
 was once just for cases regarding constitutional matters, but a recent 
act of South Africa's Parliament broadened the court's responsibilities.
Source: By Laura Smith-Spark and Faith Karimi, cnn.com, Re-posted by Abdulgafar Abdulrauf Adio (www.econsforumnews.blogspot.com) 


0 comments:
Post a Comment