
A lot of people are resistant to the idea of a “soul” because of how
this term has gotten wrapped up in religious superstition and dogma. Some
people think it is outright silly. But the concept of consciousness being
able to detach from the body offers a lot of explanatory power when it
comes to phenomenon such as Near Death Experiences, Out-Of-Body Experiences,
astral projections, and even reincarnation.
In fact, the evidence for reincarnation is the best hard scientific evidence
we have for the existence of a soul. This is a bold claim, but the
evidence for reincarnation is undeniable and cannot collectively be attributed
to chance or any other physical explanation. If reincarnation exists, the
soul exists. Let’s take a look!
Before we explore the evidence, it’s helpful to remember that we do not need
hard PROOF in order to be justified in believing in something. If the
weatherman says there is a 70% chance of showers, I don’t need proof that it’s
going to rain before I am justified in bringing an umbrella with me. I
don’t have to be certain that a meteor isn’t going to fall on my head before I
go outside.
I don’t need hard scientific proof of extra-terrestrial life in order to be
justified in believing that life exists on other planets, because there are so
many good reasons that, when taken together cumulatively, provide a plausible
account for belief in life on other planets. This is known as “abductive
reasoning” and is the kind of reasoning we use most in our every day lives.
eincarnation is not something you can objectively measure in
the same way you can measure a chemical reaction, so it may even be in
principle non-provable using the scientific method. Science is the
empirical measurement of the natural world, and the soul is something which
would exist beyond the natural world. So the question is, “Are there
enough solid pieces of evidence that, when taken together, provide a compelling
case for reincarnation?” I think the answer is a resounding yes.
The scientific evidence for reincarnation

Dr. Ian Stevenson, Ph.D., former Professor of Psychiatry at the University
of Virginia School of Medicine, spent 40 years researching reincarnation
stories within children. This former chairman of the Department of Psychiatry
and Neurology investigated over 3000 independent stories of children who
claimed to have memories and know people from their alleged past lives.
According to Stevenson, the number of cases that are worth considering is
so high that it exceeds the ability of him and his team to investigate them
all.
Birth Marks
Facial recognition software confirmed that there was in fact a facial
resemblance to their alleged prior incarnation. Some had birth marks on places
where they allegedly suffered fatal wounds from in their past life. They were
often dramatic and sometimes bizarre lesions, such as malformed digits or
missing limbs, misshapen heads, and odd markings. As Dr. Stevenson writes in
his
paper “Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased
Persons” in the peer-reviewed
Journal of Scientific Exploration:
“About 35% of children who claim to remember previous lives
have birthmarks and/or birth defects that they (or adult
informants) attribute to wounds on a person whose life the child
remembers. The cases of 210 such children have been investigated. The
birthmarks were usually areas of hairless, puckered skin; some were areas
of little or no pigmentation (hypopigmented macules); others were areas of
increased pigmentation (hyperpigmented nevi).
The birth defects were nearly always of rare types. In cases in which a
deceased person was identified the details of whose life unmistakably
matched the child’s statements, a close correspondence was nearly always
found between the birthmarks and/or birth defects on the child and the
wounds on the deceased person.
In 43 of 49 cases in which a
medical document (usually a postmortem report) was obtained, it confirmed
the correspondence between wounds and birthmarks (or birth defects).”
The memories the children recalled were far too specific to be chalked up to chance. In an
article where 3 cases were looked at in great detail by Dr. Stevenson, he reported that
each of the 3 children made roughly 30-40 claims regarding memories
that had of their past lives, 82-92% of which were both verifiable and
correct. The particularities and specific details that were
given by the children ranged from anything from the names,
personalities, and occupations of their former parents and siblings to
the precise layouts of the houses they lived in. It was not uncommon
for Stevenson to encounter a child who could go into a town he had never
been in before and give him the details of the village, former personal
belongings, the neighbourhood in which he lived in a past life, and the
people who he use to associate with.
As he concludes: “It was possible in each
case to find a family that had lost a member whose life corresponded to
the subject’s statements. The statements of the subject, taken as a
group, were sufficiently specific so that they could not have
corresponded to the life of any other person. We believe we
have excluded normal transmission of the correct information to the
subjects and that they obtained the correct information they showed
about the concerned deceased person by some paranormal process.”
- See more at:
http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-yes-the-soul-exists/#sthash.zWP4KBkp.dpuf
Verifiable memories of past lives

The memories the children recalled were far too specific to be chalked up to
chance. In an
article
where 3 cases were looked at in great detail by Dr. Stevenson, he reported
that
each of the 3 children made roughly 30-40 claims regarding
memories that had of their past lives, 82-92% of which were both verifiable and
correct. The particularities and specific details that were
given by the children ranged from anything from the names, personalities, and
occupations of their former parents and siblings to the precise layouts of the
houses they lived in. It was not uncommon for Stevenson to encounter a
child who could go into a town he had never been in before and give him the details
of the village, former personal belongings, the neighbourhood in which he lived
in a past life, and the people who he use to associate with.
As he concludes: “It was possible in each case to find a family that had
lost a member whose life corresponded to the subject’s statements. The
statements of the subject, taken as a group, were sufficiently specific so
that they could not have corresponded to the life of any other person.
We
believe we have excluded normal transmission of the correct information to
the subjects and that they obtained the correct information they showed
about the concerned deceased person by some paranormal process.”
Phobias from past-life traumas
Something which interested Dr. Stevenson was the phobias that were developed
from past-life traumas. As Dr. Jim Tucker writes:
“Another area that interested Ian was the behavior of these children. He
wrote a paper about phobias that many of the children showed, usually
related to the mode of death from the life they claimed to remember
(Stevenson, 1990a). He reported that 36% of the children in a series of
387 cases showed such fears. They occurred when the children were very
young, sometimes before they had made their claims about the previous
life. For example, he described a girl in Sri Lanka who as a baby resisted
baths so much that three adults had to hold her down to give her one. By
the age of six months, she also showed a marked phobia of buses and then
later described the life of a girl in another village who had been walking
along a narrow road between flooded paddy fields when she stepped back to
avoid a bus going by, fell into the flood water, and drowned.” The
original journal article these findings were published can be found
here.
Recognition from the scientific community

What seems to be more than mere chance is that children were able to
accurately identify former acquaintances and relationships they had with people
in their prior lives.
Most impressively was a Lebanese girl who was
able to remember and identify 25 different people from her past life and the
interpersonal relationships she had with them. His best findings were
put together in a book called Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation.
For further reading, this book would really be your best bet. The
American
Journal of Psychiatry reviewed these cases and said there were
‘‘cases recorded in such full detail as to persuade the open mind that
reincarnation is a tenable hypothesis to explain them’’. He had several other
books and papers published and widely accepted in the mainstream community.
As a review in the
Journal of the American Medical Association
stated ‘‘In regard to reincarnation he has painstakingly and unemotionally
collected a detailed series of cases from India, cases in which the evidence
is difficult to explain on any other grounds.’’ The reviewer added: ‘‘He
has placed on record a large amount of data that cannot be ignored’’. His
one paper called ‘‘
The
Explanatory Value of the Idea of Reincarnation’’ had thousands of requests
for reprints by scientists all over the world. His findings were also
published in peer reviewed journals the
Journal of Nervous and Mental
Disease, and the
International Journal of Comparative Sociology.
During a presentation at Penn State University
in 2005, Dr. Jim B. Tucker, a child psychiatrist at the University of Virginia,
described how a mother was leaning over the changing table to change her son’s
diaper. Her young toddler unexpectedly said, “When I was your age, I used to
change your diapers.” Sam Taylor, of Vermont,
was born 18 months following his grandfather’s death. When he made this
comment, he was only a few years old. When he was four and a half years old,
however, Taylor
was able to pick out his grandfather from a class picture of about 20 people
and identify his grandfather’s first car from a photograph.
Here is video of a young boys reincarnation story covered by ABC news to
provide you a glimpse into the nature of these cases. It’s important to
note that this case is American, so the parents are not influencing or
encouraging the boy to believe in reincarnation in the name of culture or
religion:
A
lot of people are resistant to the idea of a “soul” because of how
this term has gotten wrapped up in religious superstition and dogma.
Some people think it is outright silly. But the concept of
consciousness being able to detach from the body offers a lot of
explanatory power when it comes to phenomenon such as Near Death
Experiences, Out-Of-Body Experiences, astral projections, and even
reincarnation.
In fact, the evidence for reincarnation is the best hard scientific
evidence we have for the existence of a soul. This is a bold claim,
but the evidence for reincarnation is undeniable and cannot collectively
be attributed to chance or any other physical explanation. If
reincarnation exists, the soul exists. Let’s take a look!
Before we explore the evidence, it’s helpful to remember that we do
not need hard PROOF in order to be justified in believing in something.
If the weatherman says there is a 70% chance of showers, I don’t need
proof that it’s going to rain before I am justified in bringing an
umbrella with me. I don’t have to be certain that a meteor isn’t going
to fall on my head before I go outside.
I don’t need hard scientific proof of extra-terrestrial life in order
to be justified in believing that life exists on other planets, because
there are so many good reasons that, when taken together cumulatively,
provide a plausible account for belief in life on other planets. This
is known as “abductive reasoning” and is the kind of reasoning we use
most in our every day lives.
- See more at:
http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-yes-the-soul-exists/#sthash.zWP4KBkp.dpuf
A
lot of people are resistant to the idea of a “soul” because of how
this term has gotten wrapped up in religious superstition and dogma.
Some people think it is outright silly. But the concept of
consciousness being able to detach from the body offers a lot of
explanatory power when it comes to phenomenon such as Near Death
Experiences, Out-Of-Body Experiences, astral projections, and even
reincarnation.
In fact, the evidence for reincarnation is the best hard scientific
evidence we have for the existence of a soul. This is a bold claim,
but the evidence for reincarnation is undeniable and cannot collectively
be attributed to chance or any other physical explanation. If
reincarnation exists, the soul exists. Let’s take a look!
Before we explore the evidence, it’s helpful to remember that we do
not need hard PROOF in order to be justified in believing in something.
If the weatherman says there is a 70% chance of showers, I don’t need
proof that it’s going to rain before I am justified in bringing an
umbrella with me. I don’t have to be certain that a meteor isn’t going
to fall on my head before I go outside.
I don’t need hard scientific proof of extra-terrestrial life in order
to be justified in believing that life exists on other planets, because
there are so many good reasons that, when taken together cumulatively,
provide a plausible account for belief in life on other planets. This
is known as “abductive reasoning” and is the kind of reasoning we use
most in our every day lives.
- See more at:
http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/scientific-proof-of-reincarnation-yes-the-soul-exists/#sthash.zWP4KBkp.dpuf
This is just a small fraction of the amount of evidence that exists for
reincarnation. Upon coming to a conclusion about all his findings and his
publications, we have to ask ourselves “What is the best explanation that can
accommodate all of this evidence?” Why would there be so many cases of
children who claim to have been other people, who know the specific names and
interpersonal relationships of the person they recall being, who have similar
behaviour and personalities as the people they claimed to be, who have
birthmarks and abnormalities where they claimed to have suffered wounds in
their past lives, and who have specific phobias linked back to alleged past
life traumas if reincarnation did not exist?
When we consider that there is no naturalistic explanation that can account
for all of data, and when we consider the explanatory power of reincarnation,
we are more than justified in subscribing to reincarnation for scientific
reasons. The accounts are far too precise to be chalked up as chance, and all
other explanations are impoverished in trying to explain such a wide array of
data.
Reincarnation can no longer be looked at as some woo-woo, pseudoscientific,
religiously dogmatic New Age fantasy, and neither can the soul. We can
infer the reality of the soul because it is the best explanation for all of the
given data. There must be a non-physical part of us (consciousness
itself, perhaps) that contains memories that leaves our body and then enters
into a new body.
This is a hypothesis which has gotten serious attention in the mainstream
academic community, and is still ripe with investigation to this day.
When we take all the evidence together and look at it without religious
or scientific bias getting in the way, it seems as though we are not only
justified in believing in reincarnation, but it also may be the best of all
explanations for the strongest cases.
0 comments:
Post a Comment