Richard Dawkins: 'Immoral' not to abort Down's foetuses
Richard
Dawkins, the atheist writer, has caused a stir on Twitter claiming it
is "immoral" to allow unborn babies with Down's syndrome to live. But
what do the relatives of people with Down's syndrome think about the
comments?
The Oxford professor posted the message on Twitter in
response to a user who wrote she would be faced with "a real ethical
dilemma" if she became pregnant and learned that the baby would be born
with Down's syndrome.
"Abort it and try again," Dawkins tweeted in reply. "It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice."
His comments have caused anger online and have been dismissed
by charities, but he insists his views are "very civilised", tweeting:
"These are fetuses, diagnosed before they have human feelings."
For Caroline White, whose son Seb has Down's syndrome,
the comments are offensive. "What saddens me most and what can't be
denied is he backs up his argument by saying it's what the 'majority of
women' do anyway," she says. "Yes, it is. It's what most women do. Women
who, like him, like me, most probably grew up in a time of exclusion. A
time where disabled people and people with Down's were labelled and
then hidden away, never given the chance to integrate, reach their full
potential or form meaningful relationships with their wider community."
Dawkins defended his comments on the social media website
saying: "I do not for one moment apologise for approaching moral
philosophic questions in a logical way. There's a place for emotion
& this isn't it."
0 comments:
Post a Comment